IBM Study: The end of advertising as we know it.

With 25 years of marketing and advertising experience, I have had to evolve many times – but not radically. From editorial to small boutique design studio, to large traditional agency, then into the radio industry, the music business, which lead me to the entertainment sector. Now, again, over the past few years, I have been on the front lines of new models in marketing and advertising. This is different. Why, because it doesn’t look like the past 50+ years of one-way (top-down) communication. I find this to be an exciting time for a number of reasons.

Growth sectors will be born out of this down economy. Power will go to the individual consumer more than ever, which will require better product and service over the long term. Creativity will be king, and real hard evidence-accountability of marketing efforts will put to the test, beyond what Nielson Ratings could ever have imagined. It is and will continue to be a bumpy road as this study speaks to.

For those of you reading this, you are either here because you believe in the change and are embracing it, or you are unsure of what is taking place and are scared to death.  A word of advice… jump in and start swimming… eventually you’ll hop up on a surf-board and start having fun again. 

John Ayers

PS: Tonight’s #entsm tweetchat (entertainment social media) tonight will be LIVE from FOX studios-DigitalLA event. 8PM PDT. Join in on Twitter.

IBM Study: The end of advertising as we know it

Madmen1

The next 5 years will hold more change for the advertising industry than the previous 50 did.

The information for this post is from an IBM global surveys of more than 2,400 consumers and 80 advertising experts ? the report is titled, The end of advertising as we know it.?

Imagine an advertising world where ... spending on interactive, one-to-one advertising formats surpasses traditional, one-to-many advertising vehicles, and a significant share of ad space is sold through auctions and exchanges. Advertisers know who viewed and acted on an ad, and pay based on real impact rather than estimated ?impressions.? Consumers self-select which ads they watch and share preferred ads with peers. User-generated advertising is as prevalent (and appealing) as agency-created spots.

Based on IBM global surveys there are four change drivers shifting control within the ad industry:

  1. Attention ? Consumers are increasingly in control of how they view, interact with and filter advertising in a multichannel world.
  2. Creativity ? Thanks to technology, the rising popularity of user-generated and peer-delivered content, and new ad revenue-sharing models (e.g., YouTube, Crackle, Current TV), amateurs and semi- professionals are now creating lower-cost advertising content.
  3. Measurement ? Advertisers are demanding more individual-specific and involvement- based measurements, putting pressure on the traditional mass-market model.
  4. Advertising inventories ? Will be bought and sold through efficient exchanges, bypassing traditional intermediaries.

There is no question that the future of advertising will look radically different from its past. The push for control of attention, creativity, measurements and inventory will reshape the advertising value chain and shift the balance of power.

Keep in mind ? this change will also will also impact ad agency new business practices.

To learn more of where advertising agencies will need to innovate:

Advertising Agencies and Social Media: A Culture Clash

I just tweeted this story, but then realized I really should post it… it IS blog worthy.

This gets to the heart of where communication is today. The one-way vs two-way model of marketing and advertising. And how will the three-way/community communication change the way we live, what we buy, where we eat, when we travel, how we think?

Other questions that come to mind – how is the new social media model being monetized? Who is currently calling the shots, who will lead the pack for the long term, if anyone? Strategic thinking will be king. Understanding target audiences, and truly interacting with them when, where and how they want you to… will be the new norm. Getting to that point will be difficult, costly and in some cases, a long process.

If you are already in the thick of social media, you will GET this. If you are evolving, (as most are) you will find some comfort that you are not alone. But if you don’t want to take the time to read this… and you just skip down to the end of the story, I can assure you, you may be wondering why this economy has hit the traditional ad industry harder than most… and never know the answer.

Great article. 

John

Advertising Agencies And Social Media: A Culture Clash

posted by Jason Falls in September 21st, 2009 
in Advertising & Marketing

Advertising agencies around the country are trying to figure out social media. How do we do it? How do we sell it? Do we have to?

The answer is probably yes, you do have to if you want to continue to offer a full range of marketing services to your clients, and bill appropriately. Some agencies are doing a good job adjusting, hiring smart social media thinkers and getting smart about social media quickly. Others are still cocking their head sideways like a puppy trying to figure out a vacuum cleaner.

Sadly, many ad agencies never figured out Interactive, let?s call it Web 1.0. Now you add a layer of Web 2.0 or social media on top of that and many agencies and their respective creatives (art directors, copywriters, designers) and clients services folks are rendered dumb struck at the thought of all things digital.

There problem is that there exists a culture clash between ad agencies and social media marketing. The difficulty is the result of both philosophical and tactical problems. The good news is problems can be solved. But it will take some work.

The Philosophical Problems

Social media is, in many ways, the antithesis of advertising. Advertising is one-way communications aimed at large groups of consumers. Social media is two-way communications that requires listening as well as speaking. It can also be said that social media is a multiple-way communications method as brands can speak and listen, but also watch other consumers talk to each other. An agency?s creatives and strategic planners suddenly having to factor in listening and observing to their communications process after decades of just shouting from the roof tops presents a seismic culture shift.

Social media is also about building relationships. Advertising is about driving people to a buying decision. In fact, I would propose that in most cases, advertising has nothing to do with a relationship. It?s all about persuading someone to take action, not discussing the decision-making process and becoming a trusted resource for the person choosing. As Chris Heuer says, good marketing today doesn?t try to sell the customer on something. It tries to help them buy it.

Similarly, it can be said that the essence of social media, in many ways, is good customer service. I would propose that, with exceptions certainly, advertising agencies have never cared about serving the customer. They care about making the sale. Advertising is most often used to drive customers to purchase, not care for them after the fact.

So, philosophically, advertising and social media are very different. Creatives, client services folks, account planners and the like are being asked to undertake a new method of communications that runs counter to everything they?ve ever been taught.

The Tactical Problems

Peel off a layer or two in the social media and advertising comparison and you start to see some of the real reasons ad agencies struggle with social media. Please note that I offer these opinions as generalizations but not as blanket statements. There are lots of creatives, planners and the like out there who understand the social and digital worlds. While I?m sure I may furl a brow or two with this, I?m applying general truths I?ve seen through experience working for and with and asking questions about several advertising agencies over the last few years.

First, advertising creatives are taught and still primarily focus on TV, print and outdoor advertising. Despite the media trends, art schools either aren?t pushing students hard enough toward web-centric, or even web-inclusive, work; or many of today?s creatives are lost in filling their ?book,? not realizing digital is the type of compelling art agencies are in desperate need of.

Also, art directors and designers are often focused on the art, not the experience. User experience, whether tactile and off-line or virtual and on-, creates compelling engagement with consumers. Art often times is just pretty.

Interactive or digital (website and application development and programming) professionals typically come from technology backgrounds driven by code and algorithms. They?ve got the function down pat but lack the creative side, or form, to produce effective work.

To make matters worse, creative teams of art directors and copywriters are sent to brainstorm and create campaign elements but Interactive folks aren?t invited to the creative process. The creatives don?t come up with compelling interactive because the web is an afterthought. The interactive folks don?t come up with compelling interactive because they aren?t trained as creatives or they were excluded from the conceptual development process altogether.

Client services and account planning isn?t taught to think web first and often just assumes someone in the interactive department will handle guiding those decisions. The creatives think someone in the interactive department will do it, too. The interactive department is under the impression the creatives are developing the concepts and wait to be told what to build. The ball gets dropped and interactive ideas are added to the concept at the last minute with little to know strategic tie to the overall concept.

Don?t you find it strangely ironic that while most people in the typical advertising agency these days know little about digital and interactive, not to mention social media, that every advertising execution contains one consistent feature besides the logo: The website address?

Another tactical problem is that social media revolves around content creation. Not only are ad agencies not capable or prepared to create the volume and type of content required to populate blogs, Facebook pages, Twitter, YouTube and more, but social media content must be nimble, quick, conversational and responsive. What little advertising content is produced has to be run through proofing 47 times before it sees the light of day.

Providing content for clients is also antithetical to the philosophical tenants of social media. If I?m engaging in a conversation about a product as a consumer, who is a more trustworthy person to engage with, the brand manager for the product or some account guy at the ad agency that represents the product? The client is always more qualified to be the person or persons engaging with consumers about the brand.

Content creation also doesn?t scale well and is problematic for billing. Let?s say you have 20 brands producing social media content and you hire two people to produce that content. Depending upon the brand, audience and strategy, if they?re doing a good job, they?re producing an average of a blog post, Facebook content, several Tweets and perhaps video, images or some other type of content for each client every day. Can you write 10 blog posts in a day?

And how about this billing scenario: Let?s say a full-time agency employee producing content for a client is working 10 hours per week on that client?s social media efforts. They?re billed out at roughly $75 per hour. At that rate, which is conservative in price and volume, you?re billing $36,000 per year for their services as an agency. At the same time, you can go out and pay free-lance bloggers $25 per post (and that?s on the high end in most circumstances) and produce a similar volume of content for $6,500 per year (a blog post per day, five days per week, which is an aggressive clip for many agencies). How will you answer your client when they call you with a big, ?WTF??

These are the major challenges that face advertising agencies as they transition to owning and embracing social media. There are others.

Solutions

Solving the problems does take time and resources. Education is going to play a major role. In order to expedite the list and open the comments for building blocks to add to these ideas, here is a brief list of what agencies can do to integrate social media into their service offerings and disciplines:

  1. Embrace client websites as an opportunity to engage and build relationships with customers
  2. Make content portable so customers can consume it where they choose, even on mobile platforms
  3. Prioritize search engine optimization. People start their web interactions with search the vast majority of the time.
  4. Learn that well-done search advertising and email marketing campaigns have conversion rates that dwarf those of your ROI numbers on billboards and TV spots.
  5. Use social media tools internally to collaborate on projects.
  6. Use those same tools to collaborate with your clients, extending the educational experience to them.
  7. Read industry blogs.
  8. Bring in social media consultants and educators to teach everyone, not just your interactive department, how social media can improve their productivity and outputs.
  9. Incorporate social and interactive experience into the hiring requirements for client services and creatives.
  10. Watch what other brands are doing on the social web.
  11. Embrace the enthusiasm of your resident social media advocates by having them teach you social while you teach them strategic thinking.
  12. Understand that mass media still has better reach but use that reach to build communities around your brands, driving consumers to brand engagement points through social media.

Now it?s your turn. What else can advertising agencies do to turn the corner on social media expertise? The comments are yours.

A MUST READ/SEE – Best & Worst Fall TV Ads Graded

Best & Worst Fall TV Ads Graded is a quick overview of the campaigns that are suppose to launch new or returning shows to our eyeballs.

How did they do? THR Feed’s second annual critique… check it out. Let me know if you agree by leaving a comment below.
John

SEPTEMBER 15, 2009

Best & Worst Fall TV Ads Graded

It’s The Live Feed’s second annual critique of fall TV ads.

From a hypnotically gorgeous poster for the CW’s “Vampire Diaries” to a brain-dead ad for ABC’s “Hank,” here’s the best and worst of the fall…

Let’s start with the action-filled ads for NBC’s “Trauma” …

6a00d83451d69069e20120a56f6621

Impatient much? Jump to: TraumaFringeHeroesFlashForwardNCIS: Los Angeles,DollhouseDexterThe MentalistHouseThree RiversVampire DiariesCougar TownMercy,ChuckHankGood WifeCurb Your EnthusiasmDesperate HousewivesGleeNip/Tuck,CalifornicationAccidentally on PurposeMelrose PlaceThe MiddleJay Leno ShowBeautiful LifeSpartacusSons of Anarchy. (and more that didn’t make the cut)

You might also like:

The Best & Worst of Summer TCA 2009

Scientologists launch new TV ads

Homer Simpson’s worst injuries

Study: Ads make watching TV more pleasurable

Lg-share-en29127-508

Live From Daryl’s House with Daryl Hall :: Episode 23

Over a decade or so ago… the MUSIC industry was asking what’s their future. Napster, then iTunes kinda determined much of the past decade or so. Here we se a few legends (Todd Rundgren and Daryl Hall) getting together, jamming in an intimate, revealing setting.
So why blog about this?? Couple reasons.
I have been a big fan of both of these artists and their craft. Todd has been on the forefront of the Macintosh industry and quite honestly on the forefront of many evangelizing thoughts in music, entertainment and technology. Daryl Hall has been such an incredibly prolific talent that was written off as a pop artist; but in my opinion has always stayed true to his talent of producing killer soulful music. If you’re wondering about his R&B side… check out some of the early Hall and Oates work.

What I see here, is a wonderful insight into these talent artists presented in a blog format completely accessible. Sure, new upcoming artists have been doing this via MySpace, youtube and the countless other music driven sites out there… but this is different. These guys have a huge, long history, proven track record… Look for more of the legends of entertainment to tap into the social media world to truly connect to each other and share their talents in a direct way with their fans.

Love it!

“CEO Jeff Zucker Wants To Reinvent NBC” Talks about authentication and Hulu #entsm

Clear
Zucker Wants To Reinvent NBC
by David Goetzl, Yesterday, 3:44 PM

Jeff Zucker of NBCU

Its cable portfolio has propelled growth at the company lately. But NBCU remains focused on upgrading the part of the conglomerate formerly known as the National Broadcasting Company.

“The challenge is to make the first three letters of our name as strong and viable as possible,” CEO Jeff Zucker said Tuesday at an investor event.

The principal Achilles heels at NBC: prime time and its station group. The network in the post-“Friends” era has sunk to fourth place, while its owned-and-operated stations — in line with industry trends — have suffered major declines over the past 18 months-plus.

Zucker invoked the concept of a “broadcast ecosystem,” the network and how it fuels the 10 stations, as an entity that needs some reinvention.

Prime time accounts for an estimated 10% of NBCU’s revenue and profit, although Zucker admits: “The last few years have been tough. We haven’t done as well as we needed to do.”

A much-discussed strategy is producing less expensive programming that could drive revenues through cost-cutting. “The Jay Leno Show” is an example, while the New York O&O has dropped a 5 p.m. newscast in favor of a lifestyle show.

“Lower cost doesn’t mean it’s any lesser quality,” Zucker added.

In the second quarter, the NBCU broadcast segment saw revenues fall 9% to $1.4 billion. Zucker did say, however, that flaccid ad sales at the stations may since have “bottomed out.”

NBCU’s cable business had revenues up 3% in the April-June period to $1.2 billion, partly because long-term affiliate deals kept revenue flowing even in a tough ad climate.

On cable, Zucker said NBCU supports the industry’s “TV Everywhere” movement, which is designed in part to keep those affiliate fees flush. Cable and satellite operators have threatened to cut them if cable networks continue to offer full episodes of shows free online.

Operators, in turn, are experimenting with systems that give people access to the shows on the Web if an authentication process ensures they also pay for TV service. Zucker said NBCU is participating in a “TV Everywhere” trial in New York involving its Syfy channel.

“If authentication can serve as the model” to keep lucrative affiliate fees coming, “we’ll continue to support it,” he says. But Zucker notes it’s unclear whether “TV Everywhere” could further lead to new business models.

Zucker said NBCU continues to pursue a profitable digital business, notably via its stake in Hulu.com. He said NBCU has made “incremental steps,” but has not found an economic model that would be a “panacea.” He added that he expects Hulu to continue to pursue an ad-supported model and there are no plans to explore charging for content.

Separately, Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei said DirecTV is likely to also participate in “TV Everywhere” initiatives. Liberty controls 55% of the satellite operator.

Murdoch Says Ad Markets Are Improved

Murdoch Says Ad Markets Are Improved

MORE IN BUSINESS ?

News Corp. Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch said U.S. advertising markets are “much better than they were four months ago.”

Separately, Mr. Murdoch said The Wall Street Journal, owned by News Corp., will start charging users for accessing the paper on mobile devices such as Research In Motion Ltd.’s BlackBerry smart phones and Apple Inc.’s iPhone. He said newspaper subscribers would pay $1 a week for mobile access, while others would pay $2 a week.

Hc-gi053_murdoc_bv_20081106110
RUPERT MURDOCH

He also said the company is mulling plans to charge online subscriptions for Hulu, the video Web site that News Corp. launched with big media partners including NBC Universal. NBC Universal is 80% owned by General Electric Co. and 20% by Vivendi SA.

Mr. Murdoch said ad spending is nowhere near where it was in 2007, noting that revenue from News Corp.’s local broadcast stations are down 20% from last year. But he said the results have been “getting better every month and getting better every week.”

“I’m not an economist, but my guess is that the consensus is about right, and [the economy is] going to get a nice bump, and then it will settle back to a fairly slow recovery,” Mr. Murdoch said at a media conference Tuesday sponsored by Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Mr. Murdoch said News Corp. would likely hold on to its cash flow now. He added that he was pleased the company didn’t listen to Wall Street analysts and hedge-fund managers who encouraged the company to take on debt and buy back shares when the economy was booming.

“If we had followed their advice, we’d be billions [of dollars] more in debt now,” he said. “We’re feeling very safe now.”

Write to Nat Worden at nat.worden@dowjones.com

If you liked PLANET EARTH. “CURIOSITY” a new Discovery TV series, is “in the works”.

Discovery_channel

I was and am a big fan of the Planet Earth series. And have become a big fan of all things Discovery ( http://tinyurl.com/qj9xhg )  This morning I learned about a new TV series that frankly I wish I had thought of, and would love to be a part of. Who hasn’t asked life’s greatest questions… and THAT appears to be precisely what this series tends to set out to showcase.

Although it is more than a year away, I believe this could be a huge entertainment brand in the making that will have multi-platform opportunities. From the obvious TV series itself (set for Sundays at 8PM) to the on-line community already mentioned, the interactive world, social media, blogs, mobile potential and more. With such universal themes, this could be huge. 

TV Series to Explore Life?s Big Questions

Published: September 10, 2009

The Discovery Channel believes it has found its next television spectacle: trying to answer the vital questions of human existence.

On Thursday Discovery plans to announce that its founder, John Hendricks, is returning to the channel to oversee a 60-episode, five-year series titled ?Curiosity: The Questions of Our Life.?

The channel calls ?Curiosity? a landmark series, drawing comparisons to ?Planet Earth,? the 11-part environmental overview that received wide acclaim when it was shown in the United States in 2007.

?Every now and then these milestone attempts are made on TV, and this is going to be another one,? Mr. Hendricks said in a telephone interview.

Beginning in January 2011, a new one-hour episode of ?Curiosity? will be shown each month, Discovery said. While the premiere is more than a year away, the channel?s programmers have already chosen a time slot: Sundays at 8 p.m.

Discovery wants to sign high-profile producers for ?Curiosity.? David Zaslav, the chief executive of the channel?s parent company, Discovery Communications, has held talks with the director Steven Spielberg about a production partnership for the project, among other subjects, according to two people familiar with the talks who requested anonymity because they said a deal had not been reached.

The topics will befit the series?s length. Each episode will examine an issue like ?What is consciousness?? or ?Are we alone in the universe?? Other possible questions include ?How does civilization affect the planet?? and ?What is a virus, and how can it become a pandemic??

The questions ? about science, technology, medicine and other subjects ? are to be selected in collaboration with universities, including Princeton and Syracuse. In a statement the chancellor of Syracuse University, Nancy Cantor, said that Discovery was taking on an ?ambitious task of public education? through the series. Ms. Cantor called it ?a refreshing development for all of us in higher education.?

Mr. Hendricks, who calls himself the project leader for ?Curiosity,? said he wants it to showcase the ?best thinkers in the world? as they answer life?s enduring questions in an accessible way.

?We?re in the business of satisfying curiosity, and if we do that well, we think that?s an endless business,? he said.

Mr. Hendricks, who founded Discovery in 1985, remains the chairman of Discovery Communications. He stepped down as chief executive in 2004 and later developed the Experius Academy, an adult education retreat in Colorado that is scheduled to open next spring.

?Curiosity? is a joint production between Experius and Discovery; the academy is to hold complementary learning retreats with experts who appear on the series.

Discovery?s education arm will also prepare lesson plans for students. For each one-hour episode as much as four or five hours of additional content will be available on the program?s Web site.

Some ?Curiosity? episodes will be simulcast on other Discovery Communications channels, potentially including the Science Channel and Discovery HD Theater.

While Discovery is not directly portraying ?Curiosity? as the next ?Planet Earth,? it is clearly keen on recreating that series?s sense of scope and ambition. ?Planet Earth? was a co-production with the BBC and the Japanese broadcaster NHK that showed the world in stunning, close-up high-definition.

Mr. Hendricks said that such programs had value beyond ratings. ?They solidify you emotionally as a brand for your viewers,? he said.

List of great sites for filmmakers. Don’t miss tonight’s #entsm tweetchat. 8PM PDT http://pitch.pe/21628

James Hughes

James Hughes

Co-Owner at Independent Media Pros

See all James?s discussions ?

List of great sites for filmmakers…

Here are some great filmmaker’s online resources

http://www.filmsound.org – info for sound-design and foley in film
http://www.visualeffectssociety.com – you guessed it
http://www.cinematography.com – forum with great topics and info
http://www.cinematography.net/ – info for Cinematography
http://www.plotbot.com – Plotbot is web-based screenwriting software. You can write your script with as many or as few people as you want
http://www.rivalquest.com/guerilla – guerilla style filmmaking resource
http://www.sonicvisualiser.org – free audio file editing software
http://www.youtube.com – sorry, bad joke huh
http://www.rondexter.com – great how-to info
http://www.moviemaker.com – all types of film making resources
http://www.independentmediapros.com – network of composers, sound-designers and indie bands
http://www.filmmakermagazine.com – pretty much self explanitory
http://www.cinematographers.nl – the self-proclaimed cinematographers encyclopedia, lists biographies of all the major cinematographers
http://repairfaq.cis.upenn.edu/sam/icets – info on how common types of video media are transmitted
http://www.bblist.co.uk – equipment sales
http://www.kitmondo.com – used broadcast equipment
http://www.ritzcamera.com – camera sales
http://www.wtsbroadcast.com – used equipment sales
https://shootingpeople.org – network dedicated to the support and promotion of independent filmmaking
http://www.openfilm.com – high-def film hosting site with festivals
http://www.bigstar.tv – high-def film hosting site with festivals
http://www.studentfilms.com – student resources and festivals
http://www.productionhub.com – Media jobs and gigs
http://www.hollywoodeasttv.com – Network of film professionals
http://worldwideindieproducers.ning.com > – Network of film professionals
http://www.massify.com – Indie film collaboration site
http://www.filmcommunity.com – Network of film professionals
http://www.thefilmportal.net – Network of film professionals
http://www.indiebacklot.com – Network of film professionals
http://indieproducer.ning.com – Network of film professionals
http://bollywoodjobs.ning.com – Network of film professionals
http://wannabestudios.ning.com – Network of media professionals
http://digitalmoviealliance.ning.com – Network of film professionals
http://reelmix.com – film crew finding resource
http://www.crewplay.com – film crew finding resource
http://actorsconnect.com – film crew finding resource
http://www.aaton.com – high end recording gear
http://www.yb2normal.com/fancy.html – do-it-yourself camera stabilizer instructions
http://www.videocopilot.net – visual fx tutorials
http://paulzadie.com/free-stuff – a collection of production related forms and templates
http://www.screenhub.com.au – media jobs
http://www.assistantdirectors.com – links for services
http://www.studentfilmmakers.com – great resources for production
http://networking.studentfilmmakers.com – great network for student filmmakers
http://www.freesound.org – thousands of free user-uploaded sound effects
http://www.soundjay.com – free sound effects
http://www.soundsnap.com – sound effects, 5 free every month
http://www.afci.org – The Association of Film Commissioners International
http://www.artoftheguillotine.com – film editing knowledge database and forum
http://www.blssresearch.com – budget management and info
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/ – forum for all filmmaking queries
http://www.wreckamovie.com – online film production collaboration site
http://www.inktip.com – source for screenplays and writers
http://www.myproducer.tv – showcase your indie film and find collaborators
http://reel-exchange.com – find pre-screened film production services
http://reelmix.com – a crew and service finding resource

This is a first for me. I have never before posted a Linked-In Discussion. However, James Hughes has compiled a rather impressive list of web sites for filmmakers.

James Hughes is Co-Owner at Independent Media Pros.
Thanks James!

John

The 10 best film websites.

I am currently working on a new interactive campaign for an upcoming film when this great resource list came across my desk.  Some of these sites, I visit daily, but I have to admit there are a couple  (UK based) sites I was not even aware of. As all the information ever known to mankind becomes available to us on-line, it is increasingly more difficult to sift through it all and get to the core info you are looking for. There are many other film related sites out there, but Mike Peake of the Times Online compiled a nice top 10 list. Enjoy!

From 

September 6, 2009

The 10 best film websites

Movies remain the inspiration for some of the slickest, busiest and most entertaining websites around on the internet

Film fans were active on the internet even before the emergence of the worldwide web ? IMDb.com has been going for nearly 20 years and has its roots in the long-gone world of text-only newsgroups. Today, film remains the inspiration for some of the slickest, busiest and most entertaining sites around, and rising broadband speeds mean they?re able to offer increasingly high-quality clips and trailers without your having to sit through five minutes of ads first. Purist home cinema buffs can, of course, download that evocative signature tune fromwww.pearlanddean.com for the authentic experience.

IMDb.com

The Internet Movie Database is the web?s best film resource, with extensive and trustworthy credits for tens of thousands of titles. It?s also good at collating film journalism: click on the ?External reviews? button to bring up links to hundreds of online reviews from magazines and newspapers.

RottenTomatoes.com

Want a quick idea of the merit of a new release? Rotten Tomatoes gives films a percentage score aggregated from dozens of professional reviewers, with links to the source material. Great for the big titles but patchy on non-Hollywood releases.

EmpireOnline.com

The site of the UK?s biggest-selling movie magazine has a good contacts book (Steven Spielberg guest-edited a recent edition of Empire). The many quizzes, news stories and blogs are imbued with some refreshingly spiky British humour.

BoxOfficeMojo.com

This statto?s dream collates the box-office takings of the 75 highest-grossing films in the USA into a huge, searchable database. Whether you want to discover the biggest single-day opening (The Dark Knight; $67m) or the worst per-theatre average weekly take (Proud American, $128), this is the place.

AintItCool.com

No prizes for its design, but Ain?t It Cool is the best site for sneak previews and fan criticism. Avoid the messageboards, which are like roomfuls of screaming teenagers.

Hollywood.com

A huge American site that features movie news, top 10 lists, film clips, interviews and more. Particularly useful for its links to hundreds of fan sites.

SimplyScripts.com

Download the screenplays of hundreds of well-known films, as well as early drafts and sometimes even scans of the original scripts complete with handwritten amendments made during shooting.

ScreenDaily.com

The website of Screen International, the British film trade magazine, makes a welcome change from the Hollywood emphasis of most movie sites. Particularly strong on international box-office takings, reviews of art-house titles and festival news.

Apple.com/trailers

The best selection of film trailers and teasers online, many in high definition. You will need to download the latest version of Apple?s QuickTime software to play them.

10 Flixster.com

Flixster combines social networking with film geekiness. Registered users can post reviews and chat about films; the site also has numerous quizzes, news, trailers and more.

Got a subject you?d like to see covered? Send it to us attopten@sunday-times.co.uk