WOW! Olympics’ TV viewership larger than American Idol. There is hope for humanity!

OK, I actually watch American Idol… but am an avid fan of the Olympics. SO – I was please to read this article. 

To me, seeing an athlete compete on the world stage is more inspiring than the TV producing that surrounds horrible singers and drama on Idol. I should tell you that I also appreciate the great singing talent as the competition gets serious on Idol. Sure, there is drama threaded into the Olympics too… I recognize that. Bottom line: I have hope for humanity, seeing that the Olympic ratings are solid.
Thanks to Media Life for the article. 

Zowie! Olympics
beat ‘American Idol’

Games average 30 million viewers to 18.4 million

Feb 18, 2010

After six years, “American Idol’s” amazing winning streak is over.

NBC’s Winter Olympics finished ahead of the Fox smash during their shared hour last night, becoming the first program since “Fear Factor” in May 2004 to do so among either total viewers or adults 18-49. 

The Olympics averaged 30 million viewers and a 9.0 adults 18-49 rating at 9 p.m. against “Idol,” according to Nielsen overnights, well ahead of “Idol’s” still-formidable 18.4 million and 6.9 rating, both season lows.

It looks as though it will be the highest-rated night thus far of the Olympics, with early numbers tracking about 50 percent ahead of Turin four years ago.

But it took a heck of a U.S. effort to lift NBC past “Idol.” Three U.S. athletes — Shani Davis, Shaun White and Lindsey Vonn — won gold medals, increasing the U.S.’s total for these games to five. Davis’ victory was shown live, while word of Vonn’s win had already been widely circulated on the internet during the day.

Still, she and White are arguably the biggest stars on the U.S. team, with White being called one of the most dominant Olympians ever after last night’s halfpipe win. And snowboarding is very popular among young adults, the ones who also watch “Idol.”

“Idol” had defeated the Olympics by a few million viewers and a sizeable 18-49 margin on the previous night, and presumably will start a new unbeaten streak once the Winter Games are through. 

Meanwhile, NBC finished first for the night among 18-49s with an 8.9 average overnight rating and a 23 share. Fox was second at 4.5/12, CBS third at 1.8/5, Univision fourth at 1.7/4, ABC fifth at 1.5/4 and CW sixth at 0.4/1.

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback. Seven-day DVR data won?t be available for several weeks. Thirty-four percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

Also, ratings for NBC?s Olympics are approximate as fast nationals measure timeslot and not actual program data.

NBC was first during each hour of the night, beginning with a 7.6 at 8 p.m. for the Olympics, followed by Fox with a 2.1 for ?Human Target.? ABC was third with a 1.7 for repeats of ?Modern Family? and ?The Middle,? Univision fourth with a 1.5 for ?Hasta que el Dinero Nos Separe,? CBS fifth with a 1.3 for repeats of ?The New Adventures of Old Christine? and ?Gary Unmarried? and CW sixth with a 0.6 for a ?Life Unexpected? rerun.

At 9 p.m. NBC led with a 9.0 for more Olympics, followed again by Fox with a 6.9 for ?Idol.? Univision was third with a 2.4 for ?Sortilegio,? CBS fourth with a 1.9 for a repeat of ?Criminal Minds,? ABC fifth with a 1.5 for more ?Modern Family? and ?The Middle? reruns, and CW sixth with a 0.3 for a repeat of ?Gossip Girl.?

NBC was first again at 10 p.m. with a 10.1 for the Olympics, with CBS second with a 2.0 for a repeat of ?CSI: NY.? ABC was third with a 1.2 for repeats of ?Cougar Town? and Univision fourth with a 1.1 for ?Don Francisco Presenta.?

Among households, NBC led the night with a 16.7 average overnight rating and a 26 share. Fox was second at 7.4/11, CBS third at 4.5/7, ABC fourth at 2.6/4, Univision fifth at 2.1/3 and CW sixth at 0.7/1.
  

Toni Fitzgerald is a staff writer for Media Life.

A blog post from 2007 about social media is still RIGHT ON!

Why a blog post from 2007 about social media (from Forrester) methods is still RIGHT ON! People are what social media is about… and is the engine of the communication.  As in ‘normal’ communication, there is usually a reason there is a conversation – (objective). Here is where it gets interesting… in a conversation we tend to think that there isn’t a goal… but there almost certainly is. In advertising; that’s the whole point… what is the intended result of the objective – this brings us to the strategy. And then there is the change of face to face verbal, eye to eye conversation… it is technology. 

The POST Method: A systematic approach to social strategy

by Josh Bernoff
What do most companies do wrong when they enter the social world? No, it’s not that they’re being fake, or don’t “get it.” It’s that they don’t really know their objectives.
Is your company doing its social strategy backwards?
If you started by saying “we should do a blog” or “we should create a page on a social network” or “we should create a community” the answer is probably yes.
In any other business endeavor we start by figuring out what we want to accomplish. Social technologies are not magic. They accomplish things, too. It’s time to stop doing social because it’s cool. It’s time to start doing it because it’s effective.
To help clients with this fundamental idea, we invented a little acronym called POST. It’s been one of the most popular ideas we’ve ever created, even though it’s so simple and commonsensical. If you were at our consumer forum in October you saw it (and many of you who were there contacted us afterwards for help with your strategies). It’s at the heart of our book Groundswell. Now I’m sharing it with all of you.

Post_method_2

is People. Don’t start a social strategy until you know the capabilities of your audience. If you’re targeting college students, use social networks. If you’re reaching out business travelers, consider ratings and reviews. Forrester has great  data to help with this, but you can make some estimates on your own. Just don’t start without thinking about it.

is objectives. Pick one. Are you starting an application to listen to your customers, or to talk with them? To support them, or to energize your best customers to evangelize others? Or are you trying to collaborate with them? Decide on your objective before you decide on a technology. Then figure out how you will measure it.
S is Strategy. Strategy here means figuring out what will be different after you’re done. Do you want a closer, two-way relationship with your best customers? Do you want to get people talking about your products? Do you want a permanent focus group for testing product ideas and generating new ones? Imagine you succeed. How will things be different afterwards? Imagine the endpoint and you’ll know where to begin.
T is Technology. A community. A wiki. A blog or a hundred blogs. Once you know your people, objectives, and strategy, then you can decide with confidence.
This may sound simple to the sophisticated readers of this blog. But it works. Try it. Think your strategy through. Even if you’re just clarifying your own strategy, this should help you explain it to your boss.
Or, feel free to ask us for help. it’s what we do.
I came across the above article from this post about the younger generation’s growth in twitter… http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/174901

Will 2010 “UpFronts” be better or worse?

Reading this article from Broadcast and Cable about this years UpFronts. (WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upfront

Although I am not sure how steady our economy is, or how well UpFronts will do this year or in future years. The fact is, the industry changes taking place will continue to shift the entire process and entertainment content delivery is the driving force. Not to mention the entertainment pie being sliced ever so thin, forcing viewers to choose from an almost infinite number of options. One thing to watch for sure… how much will advertisers support an old model compared to how much they strike out onto new media paths.

Handicapping The Upfront Stakes

With A Strong Scatter Market And A Steadying Economy, The Upfront Is Expected To Regain Its Buzz. Here Are Seven Factors That Will Dictate How Far It Bounces Back.

By Claire Atkinson — Broadcasting & Cable, February 15, 2010

Predicting the upfront is, for media players, a favorite game of skill and luck, filled with strategy and timing. But if the pastime can normally be tabbed “Deal or No Deal,” with last year’s economy it felt more like “Jeopardy.”

That appears to have changed. Confidence in the ad market is back, if one is to judge by the number of TV companies already putting their upfront plans into overdrive. The 2010 broadcast upfront week, which kicks off May 17, is already buzzing with returning participants, including NBC and Univision.

Other indications abound. MTV’s early February upfront presentation won a positive reaction for parent company Viacom from ad agencies. And Rainbow Media’s Sundance Channel also made a play for early attention with news that it is getting into scripted programming, a la sibling AMC.

However, the question going forward is, what other factors will influence whatever terms the players on both sides can set? The nuts and bolts of the upfront is about deal-making and buying enough ratings points to reach potential customers. On that metric, TV has never been healthier. U.S. viewers watch 4 hours and 49 minutes of television a day, up 20% from a decade ago. CBS will again have a good case to present to Madison Avenue following its record ratings haul with Super Bowl XLIV and the Grammys. And yet broadcast TV is still losing viewers to cable.

While mid-February may be too soon to accurately predict where the market will land, there are already some pointers for those in the TV futures business. The ad market is under the microscope like never before, and for good reason. Indications remain inconsistent. For every gain in the fourth quarter (News Corp.’s Fox cable unit), there was a decline (Time Warner’s cable group). Super Bowl sales were big, while Olympics sales are lower than expected.

There’s lots of hope and hype, but the jury is still out as investors look to see whether marketer spending will confirm the predicted comeback in the overall economy. Here’s a handful of factors that will help those on the inside of the game know how to play their poker hand.

1. Keep Watching the Scatter Market

Ultimately, the strength of the upfront is defined by one simple equation: If demand outstrips the supply of rating points, pricing goes up; if there aren’t enough advertisers willing to put down their dollars in advance of the September start to the season, prices come down. Trying to decipher the extent of the demand for TV ad inventory isn’t easy even for those in the thick of the game.

Market-setting agencies such as GroupM, OMD and Starcom turn to the breadth of their client lists to give them a sense of what spending levels will be. On the other side of the desk, sales executives shake the trees hard for information on what their clients’ budgets will be before they count the house and attempt to set pricing.

Media buyers and sellers are all expecting the upfront sales period to be a happier affair than last year—it could hardly be worse. But before anyone puts the jumbo shrimp back on order, market-watchers will continue to look for signs that the confidence isn’t all wishful thinking.

Scatter rates are running as high as 20% above upfront pricing levels; Disney executives reported scatter rates of 30% above upfront at ABC, and in the mid-single digits at ESPN in the current quarter. In cable, a handful of earnings calls gave the market some early guidance. Discovery CFO Brad Singer said ad revenue in first quarter is running at 5% above the previous year.

That’s driving most of the confidence, according to Miller Tabak + Co. media analyst David Joyce. “The typical assumption is that scatter is driving what the level of pricing will be,” he says. Joyce thinks this upfront might look a little more like normal. It appears that sales executives will ditch the cost-conscious door-to-door road shows of 2009 in favor of somewhat splashier New York-based upfront events.

The strong demand for big-ticket TV ad buys also helps upfront optimists make their case. CBS not only sold out the Super Bowl sooner than expected, it also ran more commercial airtime than any other Super Bowl broadcaster in five years. While the network was said to have sold spots for $2.5 million to $2.8 million, networks executives insisted that some spots went for as high as $3 million. ABC’s pricing for the Academy Awards is on par with last year as well, around $1.3 million to $1.5 million per spot.

That said, even the most bullish media companies admit that it’s too soon to talk about upfront—but not too soon to make the pitch. Speaking on the firm’s latest earnings call, News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch told B&C, “We’ll be going into the upfront as the number-one network, and as strong or stronger than anybody else, but that’s about all we can say.”

However, one media buyer, who didn’t wish to be named for fear of being accused of posturing, explained that with so many advertisers spending so little on last year’s upfront, a strong scatter market was more than predictable: “We had to expect record activity and people can play that out as they wish, but they started with the bucket emptier than it ever was. I think it’s debatable if we’re looking at a robust marketplace.”

2. See How Marketers Refine Spending Plans

Automakers were a big presence in the Super Bowl, and with sales trending upward and ad budgets tied to sales projections, one might reasonably assume that this major category will urge the market north. The question is whether Toyota will limit media budgets in the short term and spend big later to win back customers.

Political ad dollars are expected to be much bigger in 2010 as the midterm elections loom, but that’s money that’s likely to benefit cable news outlets, which play in the upfront in a small way, as opposed to local stations, which don’t.

Ad agency buyers say they must contain the ebullience of media companies, along with the media that cover the upfront market, since the agencies consider the market to still be shaky. Most advertisers aren’t going to be jacking up their ad spending to any great level, they say.

Even with strong scatter pricing over the past two quarters, national TV ad sales overall were down in 2009. Numbers from Interpublic’s Magna suggest that the decline was 3.6% for the year, to $33.3 billion.

Magna’s longer-term outlook for TV is far from disastrous. National TV is expected to grow by 6.2% in 2010, to $35.3 billion, and 4.1% over the next five years.

But Tony Pace, chief marketing officer at Subway, disagrees: “I think the economy is weaker than the perception. I just don’t think [the true picture] will play out fast enough for the upfront market.”

As if on cue, the Association of National Advertisers on Feb. 3 released its ritual report on ad spending projections for this year. Titled the ANA Recession Survey, the report says that clients are more optimistic, but its findings are hardly a ringing endorsement of a comeback. According to the report, 53% of marketers say they are reducing their advertising media budgets. Fifty-nine percent of marketers say that their budgets will stay the same, while 19% are hopeful that budgets will increase.

“While it appears as though cutting costs may be the new reality even when times are good, our series of surveys suggest that the deepest cuts may have already been made,” ANA President Bob Liodice said in a statement that accompanied the survey.

National TV Ad Spending

YEAR AMOUNT % CHANGE*
* Estimated change from previous year
Source: Magna
2009 $33.3 billion -3.6
2010 $35.3 billion +6.2
2011 $37.05 billion +4.9

 

3. Whatever Can Be Measured Can Be Sold

For the full story go to B&C  

Is authentic influence a social media oxy-moron?

Currently reading this great article on branding, businesses and the importance of authentic influence in today’s media climate.

Some good thoughts here to consider. Be sure to read the Brian Solis blog as well. You may also want to consider checking out a recent post about how our trust in friends may be shifting. Enjoy!

Why getting attention is never enough

By Jesse Stanchak on February 12, 2010 | 0 Comments and 0 Reactions

Trust-300x214

Not too long ago, I was at a networking event where someone came up to me and said, in an almost confidential tone, “I really hate these things. I hate these people. I’m just here to promote my business.” Then he gave me his elevator pitch, handed me his card and walked away.

I wasn’t surprised. I meet at least one of these people at every event I go to, even at events that are supposed to be about social media. They say things like, “I want bloggers to promote my product, but I don’t want to have to talk to them,” or, “My customers aren’t smart enough to speak for my brand.”

I always hope these people have the decency to fail quickly so that everyone else involved in their venture can move on with their lives.

Brian Solis argues that businesses need to create content so that they can build engagement and eventually develop influence. That might not seem like a terribly radical statement — until you stop to consider that so many social strategies end with simply getting people’s attention. We put so much thought into casting the line that actually reeling in the fish sometimes takes a back seat.

Today I realized that these poor souls that I meet at conventions probably don’t hate the people they’re pitching to — they’re just frustrated because they’re mastered the art of attracting attention without the ability to convert it into influence. They’re missing out on the middle step: Building engagement.

You can’t forbid a person from saying no to you. You can only ever give them reasons to say yes. The best reason to say yes to a person is because you trust them to take care of you. Whether your social-media platform is out there to make sales or provide customer service, you need to take the time to establish that trust. Even if you’re really just trying to “get the word out” about you product, make sure that word feels authentic and trustworthy. Otherwise, you might just find yourself at a bar down the line, horrifying some social-media blogger with stories about how your customers are the stupid ones.

How can businesses make the leap from attracting attention to building trust? Anyone else met a misanthropic salesmen at a social-media event?

Washington DC Weather Conditions from The Weather Channel

As I sit at a local establishment on the westside of Los Angeles with my first gen iPhone… I continue to be impressed with technology.

Just downloaded the FREE weather channel app… video, severe alerts, forecasts and more.

And yes… Now I blog/post about too.

Local Severe Weather Alert for Washington, DC

…EXTREMELY DANGEROUS WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS CONTINUE THIS EVENING FOR THE BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON REGION…CENTRAL MARYLAND…SOUTHERN MARYLAND…AND THE EXTREME EASTERN PANHANDLE OF WEST VIRGINIA… DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DRIVE THIS EVENING. DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE STORM IS WINDING DOWN LATER THIS EVENING…GUSTY WINDS TO 40 MPH WILL CONTINUE TO PRODUCE GROUND BLIZZARD CONDITIONS DUE TO BLOWING AND FALLING SNOW. WHILE ALL REGIONS IN THE AREA ARE EXPERIENCING EXTREMELY DANGEROUS CONDITIONS…BALTIMORE COUNTY…THE CITY OF BALTIMORE…ANNE ARUNDEL…HOWARD…FREDERICK…CARROLL…AND HARFORD COUNTIES IN MARYLAND ARE EXPERIENCING PARTICULARLY HAZARDOUS WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS THROUGH 10:00 PM. PEOPLE ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIMPLY STAY INSIDE…ENJOY YOUR FAVORITE INDOOR ACTIVITIES…AND RIDE THIS STORM OUT…THE HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS WILL BE IMPROVING LATER THIS EVENING. STAYING OFF THE ROAD WILL HELP LOCAL AND STATE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENTS BETTER CLEAR KEY TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS. IF YOU GET STRANDED IN YOUR VEHICLE…DO NOT LEAVE YOUR CAR TO TRY TO WALK FOR ASSISTANCE…YOU CAN QUICKLY BECOME DISORIENTED IN WIND DRIVEN SNOW AND COLD. THIS STORM WILL SUBSIDE EARLY THIS EVENING…SO WAIT IN YOUR CAR FOR EMERGENCY HELP TO ARRIVE. PERIODICALLY RUN YOUR ENGINE FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES EACH HOUR FOR HEAT. ENSURE YOUR EXHAUST PIPE IS CLEARED OF SNOW AND ICE. CRACK YOUR WINDOWS TO AVOID CARBON MONOXIDE POISONING. TIE A COLORED CLOTH TO YOUR CARS ANTENNA OR WINDOW TO BE VISIBLE TO RESCUERS. FROM TIME-TO-TIME…MOVE YOUR ARMS…LEGS…FINGERS…AND TOES TO KEEP BLOOD CIRCULATING.

Sent from my iPhone

Foursquare Signs a Deal With Zagat (NY Times, Winter Olympics, Bravo, HBO and Warner Bros?)

Fsq

Only a matter of time…

As a user and maybe even a fan of Foursquare, I often ask… “why am in ‘checking in’ anyway”, but yet I continue to do so. Partly because it’s kinda fun… but mostly because I am a strong believer that local communication is king. Social media that is relevant and geo-location based technology is an integral part of the equation.

Check out this recent article about Foursquare inking a deal with ZAGAT

Foursquare Signs a Deal With Zagat

Update | 1:43 PM Adding 

information about a new content partnership between Foursquare and The New York Times, in conjunction with the Winter Olympics.

Foursquare, the location-based mobile application that is capturing the fancy of hip urbanites, is a bar game that lets users compete for points and badges when they go out at night. But recently the service has been branching out beyond its bar-hopping origins.

On Tuesday, Foursquare is announcing a partnership with Zagat, the restaurant-guide publishers. It plans to offer a ?Foodie? badge that can be earned by checking into Zagat-rated restaurants in New York, San Francisco, Chicago and other major cities.

In addition to pointing toward a business model for Foursquare, the collaboration with Zagat underscores the popularity of the service and could help extend its reach to a mainstream audience. It is one of several deals that the company has been hammering out.

Foursquare recently signed an agreement to integrate Bravo TV shows with the game aspects of its service, and it is working with Warner Brothers topromote the studio?s romantic comedy ?Valentine?s Day.? The company is working on a similar partnership with HBO, said Tristan Walker, Foursquare?s head of business development, and The New York Times is experimenting with the service. Some of these companies are paying Foursquare, Mr. Walker said, but he declined to disclose the terms of the deals.

Ryan Charles, a senior product manager at Zagat, said the collaboration was a natural progression for the company, which has dabbled in other creative online ventures, using Twitter and creating a so-called augmented reality application for Android-powered mobile phones.

?We saw thousands of Foursquare users checking in to Zagat-rated restaurants, and saw an opportunity to present content to them as well as engage them in game-play,? said Mr. Charles, who first heard about the mobile company last year at the annual technology conference South by Southwest Interactive.

In addition to offering a special badge for Foursquare users, Zagat will begin piping tips and recommendations into the Foursquare system, which already doubles as a user-generated city guide. Foursquare users can submit their own suggestions for activities and dishes to order at a particular restaurant, which will pop up when their friends ?check in? on Foursquare from that venue.

But the Zagat partnership will add a slightly different layer to the content by incorporating recommendations culled from the company?s repository of reader reviews. For example, users who check into a Zagat-ranked restaurant will receive suggestions about great dishes or the best dessert on the menu.

Zagat also plans to run a series of ?Meet the Mayor? interviews on its Web site, featuring Foursquare users who have checked in enough times at a particular location to earn the ?mayor? title.

?There?s an added incentive for users to be the mayor of a Zagat-rated restaurant,? Mr. Charles said. ?Also, visitors to our site who may not already know about Foursquare will learn about it. It?s a great cross-promotion.?

Foursquare has also been forging partnerships with city transit agencies, universities and media companies, like the Canadian daily Metro News. On Friday it will add The New York Times to the list.

In conjunction with the Winter Olympics, The Times will be offering recommendations to Foursquare users on restaurants, attractions, shopping and nightlife in Vancouver, Whistler and the nearby town of Squamish. The tips will be pulled from The Times?s travel and entertainment coverage.

Foursquare users who check in at one of the suggested venues will earn a New York Times Olympics badge, said Stacy Green, public relations manager for The New York Times Company.

?Going forward,? Ms. Green said,  ?we are looking into other ways we can work with Foursquare in New York and other markets to integrate our strong travel and entertainment content.?

Great AdAge article of On-line video and advertising. Coming soon, Nielson data of online viewing!?

Currently reading this article… and can’t help but once again question what will CONTENT DELIVERY look like in 5 or 10 years from now? With DVR, TIVO now shifting to HULUSlingbox and FloTV

Online Video One Step Closer to TV-Sized Ad Loads

Nielsen Commercial-Ratings Study Will Include Corresponding Views of Commercials on Web

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) — In the short history of online TV-watching, one standard has largely held fast: Shows that run online have significantly fewer ads than shows that run on the boob tube.

But that could soon change.

Starting this fall, Nielsen intends to start making available data that take into account viewing of commercials that run in a particular show, no matter whether they are seen online or on TV. The data will be made available for evaluation starting this September and are intended to become the basis for ad negotiations in February 2011.

But here’s the catch: For Nielsen to be able to provide the commercial rating, shows seen online will have to have the same group of commercials that run on TV. If this system were adopted en masse — and it’s not clear that it would be — online viewing might be crammed just as full of commercials as the more traditional TV-watching experience.

“That in itself is a challenge,” said Rino Scanzoni, chief investment officer at WPP’s Group M. “The consumer has been used to getting [online video] with either limited commercial interruption or no commercial interruption.”

Indeed, viewing programs on Hulu, the online video site owned by NBC Universal, News Corp. and Walt Disney, means encountering significantly fewer ads than one would see watching TV. And Disney’s ABC.com has met with some success by running ABC shows with just a few ads, often from a single advertiser.

But many TV executives say these methods don’t bring much, if any, profit — and therefore cannot continue.

Solutions
“The financial models used for the current large video hubs in the online space are not sustainable,” said Jack Wakshlag, chief research officer for Time Warner’s Turner Broadcasting. One way to make online viewing more financially lucrative, several TV executives suggested, is to use it to aggregate viewing of popular shows across TV, online and other emerging media — and then use that rating as a means of negotiating for the cost of an ad against the program.

What’s lending traction to the idea of increasing the number of commercials in online TV runs is the “TV Everywhere” concept currently embraced by industry players Time Warner and Comcast, among others. Under the plan, cable subscribers would be able to watch their favorite shows via broadband for no extra fees, while non-subscribers would be blocked. If the media companies can use this idea to control how consumers watch TV programming, they may also be able to force a more traditional amount of advertising on them, too.

Nielsen says it is simply trying to come up with methods it believes its clients truly want — and that this idea is only one solution among many it intends to offer.

“Ultimately, the programmers — the guys who own the TV content — they’re all struggling to find out what the best business model is that works for them. There is a divide,” said Sara Erichson, president?media client services, North America, at Nielsen.

She’s not kidding. Some TV executives envision a day when ad-free online viewing might have to include a subscription of some sort to make it work financially. When faced with that prospect, said one TV-network executive, research suggests that 80% to 90% of people would rather watch TV online with the same load of ads as a traditional TV show. “People don’t want to pay more subscription fees on top of their cable subscription fee,” this executive said.

Consumer response?
Yet others are more wary. Media companies “can monetize their internet video, but it’s all going to come down to how the consumer actually responds,” said Colleen Fahey Rush, executive VP-strategic insights and research, Viacom’s MTV Networks. If “the ad load is higher than it currently is,” she asked, could it “tamp down” consumption of video online?

One academic thinks consumers will, over time, accept more advertising in the digital realm. “It’s not so much the ad load. It’s much more about the convenience,” said Tom Ksiazek, an assistant professor of communication at Villanova University. Research suggests that “viewers will watch those ads as long as the program is on the best available screen” for them at the time they want to view a program that is important to them.

Already, Mr. Ksiazek’s theory has borne out under other circumstances. In 2008, ABC said it would increase the availability of popular shows such as “Grey’s Anatomy” for video-on-demand viewing on cable systems — as long as consumers had no ability to fast-forward past the commercials. Citing a trial of the concept it ran on a cable system owned by Cox Communications, ABC said 93% of people who had their fast-forwarding capabilities removed when watching ABC programs on-demand found having to watch ads an acceptable exchange for getting to see the programs free. About 20% of users said they used on-demand to watch an ABC program rather than using a digital video recorder.

At the very least, media companies appear ready to test out Nielsen’s idea, though many of them say they will also embrace other experiments that bubble up in a time of great change for the industry. “We are exploring revenue models with various ad loads and promo loads,” said Turner’s Mr. Wakshlag, “but we won’t really know what will shake out until the marketplace develops.”

Icon-twitterIcon-facebookIcon-diggIcon-googleIcon-stumbleuponIcon-linkedinIcon-newsvineIcon-delIcon-reddit

Content Deliver – TV vs Internet – What does the future hold?

It seems that in the time where the economic downturn has forced many to seek areas of their spending habits that they can save some money… home entertainment may be one area.

The monthly phone, cable, internet, mobile, etc bills add up quick. A recent study/article shows some numbers that to me seem quite alarming. Although they don’t seem to sound worried… I suggest that the number of people ‘cutting the chord’ from their cable bill will rise as internet content delivery grows.

Report: Online Services Not Posing Huge Threat to Pay TV
By Mansha Daswani
Published: February 4, 2010

DALLAS: Less than 8 percent of U.S. broadband homes?about 5.5 million homes?are considering canceling their pay-TV subscriptions in favor of online video, a Parks Associates report indicates.

The report, All Eyes on Video, notes that the unlikelihood of subscriber churn this year is in line with previous studies, despite the proliferation of available content online. A 2008 study reported 11 percent of U.S. broadband households were considering canceling pay-TV services, and in a 2009 survey the number was 10 percent.

While 5.5 million homes would be open to canceling pay TV due in part to the availability of online video, about 50 percent of these households are also considering a switch to a new pay-TV provider. The households likely to switch or cancel their services are high consumers of online video, watching ten hours per week. They are also interested in TV Everywhere services that can provide online access to pay-TV channels.

“The threat of cannibalization is real but misunderstood,” said John Barrett, the director of research at Parks Associates. “Nobody is going to rely on online video alone?households likely to cancel their TV services are going to use a mixture of online video, free-to-air broadcasts, and DVDs, including rental services such as Netflix and redbox.”

Know the Difference between a Cold and H1N1 Flu Symptoms:

Know the Difference between a Cold and H1N1 Flu Symptoms: 

Symptom 
Cold
H1N1 Flu
Fever
Fever is rare
Temperatures of  100?F or higher for 3 to 4 days
Coughing
A hacking (mucusproducing) cough is often present
A dry cough is usually present
Aches
Slight body aches and pains
Severe aches and pains
Stuffy Nose
Stuffy nose is commonly present and typically resolves spontaneously within a week 
Stuffy nose is not commonly present 
Chills
Chills are uncommon
Chills occur in 60% of cases
Tiredness
Tiredness is fairly mild 
Tiredness is moderate to severe
Sneezing
Sneezing is common
Sneezing is not common
Sudden Symptoms
Symptoms tend to develop over a few days 
Rapid onset within 3-6 hours with sudden symptoms of high fever – muscle aches – shortness of breath – tight chest 
Headache
Headaches are fairly mild
Headache occur in 80% of cases
Sore Throat
Sore throat is commonly present
Sore throat is not commonly present
Chest Discomfort
Chest discomfort is mild to moderate
Chest discomfort is often severe

?
According to the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, those who died of swine flu often had co-infections with bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumoniae or pneumococcus. researchers analyzed specimens taken from 77 fatal cases of H1N1. Bacterial infections such as Streptococcus pneumonia were found in about one-third of the cases analyzed. 

How do I protect myself and my family from Novel Influenza A (H1N1)?
 

  • Wash your hands. After you sneeze, handle raw food or use the toilet, be sure to wash your hands. Before you eat you should wash your hands as well. Proper hand washing takes about 20 seconds (about as long as the Happy Birthday song) using a bar or liquid soap. Alternatively, alcohol-based hand sanitizers are also effective.
    (Source: mayoclinic.com)
  • Disinfect the surfaces in your home. By cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in your home such as countertops, telephones and doorknobs you can help prevent viruses from spreading from person to person.
  • Avoid close contact with sick people. If you do come into contact with someone who is sick, avoid touching your nose and mouth. This will help prevent germs from spreading.
  • If you are sick, stay home for 7 days after your symptoms begin or until you have been symptom-free for 24 hours, whichever is longer. This is to keep from infecting others and spreading the virus further.