I love this site… and am often inspired… happy to share the link.
http://www.thecoolhunter.net/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Newsletters&utm_con…
I love this site… and am often inspired… happy to share the link.
http://www.thecoolhunter.net/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=Newsletters&utm_con…
P is People. Don’t start a social strategy until you know the capabilities of your audience. If you’re targeting college students, use social networks. If you’re reaching out business travelers, consider ratings and reviews. Forrester has great data to help with this, but you can make some estimates on your own. Just don’t start without thinking about it.But Tony Pace, chief marketing officer at Subway, disagrees: “I think the economy is weaker than the perception. I just don’t think [the true picture] will play out fast enough for the upfront market.”
As if on cue, the Association of National Advertisers on Feb. 3 released its ritual report on ad spending projections for this year. Titled the ANA Recession Survey, the report says that clients are more optimistic, but its findings are hardly a ringing endorsement of a comeback. According to the report, 53% of marketers say they are reducing their advertising media budgets. Fifty-nine percent of marketers say that their budgets will stay the same, while 19% are hopeful that budgets will increase.
“While it appears as though cutting costs may be the new reality even when times are good, our series of surveys suggest that the deepest cuts may have already been made,” ANA President Bob Liodice said in a statement that accompanied the survey.
National TV Ad Spending
| YEAR | AMOUNT | % CHANGE* |
| * Estimated change from previous year Source: Magna |
||
| 2009 | $33.3 billion | -3.6 |
| 2010 | $35.3 billion | +6.2 |
| 2011 | $37.05 billion | +4.9 |
Why a blog post from 2007 about social media (from Forrester) methods is still RIGHT ON! People are what social media is about… and is the engine of the communication. As in ‘normal’ communication, there is usually a reason there is a conversation – (objective). Here is where it gets interesting… in a conversation we tend to think that there isn’t a goal… but there almost certainly is. In advertising; that’s the whole point… what is the intended result of the objective – this brings us to the strategy. And then there is the change of face to face verbal, eye to eye conversation… it is technology.
Reading this article from Broadcast and Cable about this years UpFronts. (WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upfront
Predicting the upfront is, for media players, a favorite game of skill and luck, filled with strategy and timing. But if the pastime can normally be tabbed “Deal or No Deal,” with last year’s economy it felt more like “Jeopardy.”
That appears to have changed. Confidence in the ad market is back, if one is to judge by the number of TV companies already putting their upfront plans into overdrive. The 2010 broadcast upfront week, which kicks off May 17, is already buzzing with returning participants, including NBC and Univision.
Other indications abound. MTV’s early February upfront presentation won a positive reaction for parent company Viacom from ad agencies. And Rainbow Media’s Sundance Channel also made a play for early attention with news that it is getting into scripted programming, a la sibling AMC.
However, the question going forward is, what other factors will influence whatever terms the players on both sides can set? The nuts and bolts of the upfront is about deal-making and buying enough ratings points to reach potential customers. On that metric, TV has never been healthier. U.S. viewers watch 4 hours and 49 minutes of television a day, up 20% from a decade ago. CBS will again have a good case to present to Madison Avenue following its record ratings haul with Super Bowl XLIV and the Grammys. And yet broadcast TV is still losing viewers to cable.
While mid-February may be too soon to accurately predict where the market will land, there are already some pointers for those in the TV futures business. The ad market is under the microscope like never before, and for good reason. Indications remain inconsistent. For every gain in the fourth quarter (News Corp.’s Fox cable unit), there was a decline (Time Warner’s cable group). Super Bowl sales were big, while Olympics sales are lower than expected.
There’s lots of hope and hype, but the jury is still out as investors look to see whether marketer spending will confirm the predicted comeback in the overall economy. Here’s a handful of factors that will help those on the inside of the game know how to play their poker hand.
Ultimately, the strength of the upfront is defined by one simple equation: If demand outstrips the supply of rating points, pricing goes up; if there aren’t enough advertisers willing to put down their dollars in advance of the September start to the season, prices come down. Trying to decipher the extent of the demand for TV ad inventory isn’t easy even for those in the thick of the game.
Market-setting agencies such as GroupM, OMD and Starcom turn to the breadth of their client lists to give them a sense of what spending levels will be. On the other side of the desk, sales executives shake the trees hard for information on what their clients’ budgets will be before they count the house and attempt to set pricing.
Media buyers and sellers are all expecting the upfront sales period to be a happier affair than last year—it could hardly be worse. But before anyone puts the jumbo shrimp back on order, market-watchers will continue to look for signs that the confidence isn’t all wishful thinking.
Scatter rates are running as high as 20% above upfront pricing levels; Disney executives reported scatter rates of 30% above upfront at ABC, and in the mid-single digits at ESPN in the current quarter. In cable, a handful of earnings calls gave the market some early guidance. Discovery CFO Brad Singer said ad revenue in first quarter is running at 5% above the previous year.
That’s driving most of the confidence, according to Miller Tabak + Co. media analyst David Joyce. “The typical assumption is that scatter is driving what the level of pricing will be,” he says. Joyce thinks this upfront might look a little more like normal. It appears that sales executives will ditch the cost-conscious door-to-door road shows of 2009 in favor of somewhat splashier New York-based upfront events.
The strong demand for big-ticket TV ad buys also helps upfront optimists make their case. CBS not only sold out the Super Bowl sooner than expected, it also ran more commercial airtime than any other Super Bowl broadcaster in five years. While the network was said to have sold spots for $2.5 million to $2.8 million, networks executives insisted that some spots went for as high as $3 million. ABC’s pricing for the Academy Awards is on par with last year as well, around $1.3 million to $1.5 million per spot.
That said, even the most bullish media companies admit that it’s too soon to talk about upfront—but not too soon to make the pitch. Speaking on the firm’s latest earnings call, News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch told B&C, “We’ll be going into the upfront as the number-one network, and as strong or stronger than anybody else, but that’s about all we can say.”
However, one media buyer, who didn’t wish to be named for fear of being accused of posturing, explained that with so many advertisers spending so little on last year’s upfront, a strong scatter market was more than predictable: “We had to expect record activity and people can play that out as they wish, but they started with the bucket emptier than it ever was. I think it’s debatable if we’re looking at a robust marketplace.”
Automakers were a big presence in the Super Bowl, and with sales trending upward and ad budgets tied to sales projections, one might reasonably assume that this major category will urge the market north. The question is whether Toyota will limit media budgets in the short term and spend big later to win back customers.
Political ad dollars are expected to be much bigger in 2010 as the midterm elections loom, but that’s money that’s likely to benefit cable news outlets, which play in the upfront in a small way, as opposed to local stations, which don’t.
Ad agency buyers say they must contain the ebullience of media companies, along with the media that cover the upfront market, since the agencies consider the market to still be shaky. Most advertisers aren’t going to be jacking up their ad spending to any great level, they say.
Even with strong scatter pricing over the past two quarters, national TV ad sales overall were down in 2009. Numbers from Interpublic’s Magna suggest that the decline was 3.6% for the year, to $33.3 billion.
Magna’s longer-term outlook for TV is far from disastrous. National TV is expected to grow by 6.2% in 2010, to $35.3 billion, and 4.1% over the next five years.
But Tony Pace, chief marketing officer at Subway, disagrees: “I think the economy is weaker than the perception. I just don’t think [the true picture] will play out fast enough for the upfront market.”
As if on cue, the Association of National Advertisers on Feb. 3 released its ritual report on ad spending projections for this year. Titled the ANA Recession Survey, the report says that clients are more optimistic, but its findings are hardly a ringing endorsement of a comeback. According to the report, 53% of marketers say they are reducing their advertising media budgets. Fifty-nine percent of marketers say that their budgets will stay the same, while 19% are hopeful that budgets will increase.
“While it appears as though cutting costs may be the new reality even when times are good, our series of surveys suggest that the deepest cuts may have already been made,” ANA President Bob Liodice said in a statement that accompanied the survey.
National TV Ad Spending
| YEAR | AMOUNT | % CHANGE* |
| * Estimated change from previous year Source: Magna |
||
| 2009 | $33.3 billion | -3.6 |
| 2010 | $35.3 billion | +6.2 |
| 2011 | $37.05 billion | +4.9 |
Not too long ago, I was at a networking event where someone came up to me and said, in an almost confidential tone, “I really hate these things. I hate these people. I’m just here to promote my business.” Then he gave me his elevator pitch, handed me his card and walked away.
I wasn’t surprised. I meet at least one of these people at every event I go to, even at events that are supposed to be about social media. They say things like, “I want bloggers to promote my product, but I don’t want to have to talk to them,” or, “My customers aren’t smart enough to speak for my brand.”
I always hope these people have the decency to fail quickly so that everyone else involved in their venture can move on with their lives.
Brian Solis argues that businesses need to create content so that they can build engagement and eventually develop influence. That might not seem like a terribly radical statement — until you stop to consider that so many social strategies end with simply getting people’s attention. We put so much thought into casting the line that actually reeling in the fish sometimes takes a back seat.
Today I realized that these poor souls that I meet at conventions probably don’t hate the people they’re pitching to — they’re just frustrated because they’re mastered the art of attracting attention without the ability to convert it into influence. They’re missing out on the middle step: Building engagement.
You can’t forbid a person from saying no to you. You can only ever give them reasons to say yes. The best reason to say yes to a person is because you trust them to take care of you. Whether your social-media platform is out there to make sales or provide customer service, you need to take the time to establish that trust. Even if you’re really just trying to “get the word out” about you product, make sure that word feels authentic and trustworthy. Otherwise, you might just find yourself at a bar down the line, horrifying some social-media blogger with stories about how your customers are the stupid ones.
How can businesses make the leap from attracting attention to building trust? Anyone else met a misanthropic salesmen at a social-media event?
Currently reading this great article on branding, businesses and the importance of authentic influence in today’s media climate.
Not too long ago, I was at a networking event where someone came up to me and said, in an almost confidential tone, “I really hate these things. I hate these people. I’m just here to promote my business.” Then he gave me his elevator pitch, handed me his card and walked away.
I wasn’t surprised. I meet at least one of these people at every event I go to, even at events that are supposed to be about social media. They say things like, “I want bloggers to promote my product, but I don’t want to have to talk to them,” or, “My customers aren’t smart enough to speak for my brand.”
I always hope these people have the decency to fail quickly so that everyone else involved in their venture can move on with their lives.
Brian Solis argues that businesses need to create content so that they can build engagement and eventually develop influence. That might not seem like a terribly radical statement — until you stop to consider that so many social strategies end with simply getting people’s attention. We put so much thought into casting the line that actually reeling in the fish sometimes takes a back seat.
Today I realized that these poor souls that I meet at conventions probably don’t hate the people they’re pitching to — they’re just frustrated because they’re mastered the art of attracting attention without the ability to convert it into influence. They’re missing out on the middle step: Building engagement.
You can’t forbid a person from saying no to you. You can only ever give them reasons to say yes. The best reason to say yes to a person is because you trust them to take care of you. Whether your social-media platform is out there to make sales or provide customer service, you need to take the time to establish that trust. Even if you’re really just trying to “get the word out” about you product, make sure that word feels authentic and trustworthy. Otherwise, you might just find yourself at a bar down the line, horrifying some social-media blogger with stories about how your customers are the stupid ones.
How can businesses make the leap from attracting attention to building trust? Anyone else met a misanthropic salesmen at a social-media event?
As I sit at a local establishment on the westside of Los Angeles with my first gen iPhone… I continue to be impressed with technology.
Just downloaded the FREE weather channel app… video, severe alerts, forecasts and more. And yes… Now I blog/post about too. Local Severe Weather Alert for Washington, DC …EXTREMELY DANGEROUS WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS CONTINUE THIS EVENING FOR THE BALTIMORE-WASHINGTON REGION…CENTRAL MARYLAND…SOUTHERN MARYLAND…AND THE EXTREME EASTERN PANHANDLE OF WEST VIRGINIA… DO NOT ATTEMPT TO DRIVE THIS EVENING. DESPITE THE FACT THAT THE STORM IS WINDING DOWN LATER THIS EVENING…GUSTY WINDS TO 40 MPH WILL CONTINUE TO PRODUCE GROUND BLIZZARD CONDITIONS DUE TO BLOWING AND FALLING SNOW. WHILE ALL REGIONS IN THE AREA ARE EXPERIENCING EXTREMELY DANGEROUS CONDITIONS…BALTIMORE COUNTY…THE CITY OF BALTIMORE…ANNE ARUNDEL…HOWARD…FREDERICK…CARROLL…AND HARFORD COUNTIES IN MARYLAND ARE EXPERIENCING PARTICULARLY HAZARDOUS WINTER WEATHER CONDITIONS THROUGH 10:00 PM. PEOPLE ARE ENCOURAGED TO SIMPLY STAY INSIDE…ENJOY YOUR FAVORITE INDOOR ACTIVITIES…AND RIDE THIS STORM OUT…THE HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS WILL BE IMPROVING LATER THIS EVENING. STAYING OFF THE ROAD WILL HELP LOCAL AND STATE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENTS BETTER CLEAR KEY TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS. IF YOU GET STRANDED IN YOUR VEHICLE…DO NOT LEAVE YOUR CAR TO TRY TO WALK FOR ASSISTANCE…YOU CAN QUICKLY BECOME DISORIENTED IN WIND DRIVEN SNOW AND COLD. THIS STORM WILL SUBSIDE EARLY THIS EVENING…SO WAIT IN YOUR CAR FOR EMERGENCY HELP TO ARRIVE. PERIODICALLY RUN YOUR ENGINE FOR ABOUT 10 MINUTES EACH HOUR FOR HEAT. ENSURE YOUR EXHAUST PIPE IS CLEARED OF SNOW AND ICE. CRACK YOUR WINDOWS TO AVOID CARBON MONOXIDE POISONING. TIE A COLORED CLOTH TO YOUR CARS ANTENNA OR WINDOW TO BE VISIBLE TO RESCUERS. FROM TIME-TO-TIME…MOVE YOUR ARMS…LEGS…FINGERS…AND TOES TO KEEP BLOOD CIRCULATING. Sent from my iPhone
Only a matter of time…
Update | 1:43 PM Adding
Foursquare, the location-based mobile application that is capturing the fancy of hip urbanites, is a bar game that lets users compete for points and badges when they go out at night. But recently the service has been branching out beyond its bar-hopping origins.
On Tuesday, Foursquare is announcing a partnership with Zagat, the restaurant-guide publishers. It plans to offer a “Foodie” badge that can be earned by checking into Zagat-rated restaurants in New York, San Francisco, Chicago and other major cities.
In addition to pointing toward a business model for Foursquare, the collaboration with Zagat underscores the popularity of the service and could help extend its reach to a mainstream audience. It is one of several deals that the company has been hammering out.
Foursquare recently signed an agreement to integrate Bravo TV shows with the game aspects of its service, and it is working with Warner Brothers topromote the studio’s romantic comedy “Valentine’s Day.” The company is working on a similar partnership with HBO, said Tristan Walker, Foursquare’s head of business development, and The New York Times is experimenting with the service. Some of these companies are paying Foursquare, Mr. Walker said, but he declined to disclose the terms of the deals.
Ryan Charles, a senior product manager at Zagat, said the collaboration was a natural progression for the company, which has dabbled in other creative online ventures, using Twitter and creating a so-called augmented reality application for Android-powered mobile phones.
“We saw thousands of Foursquare users checking in to Zagat-rated restaurants, and saw an opportunity to present content to them as well as engage them in game-play,” said Mr. Charles, who first heard about the mobile company last year at the annual technology conference South by Southwest Interactive.
In addition to offering a special badge for Foursquare users, Zagat will begin piping tips and recommendations into the Foursquare system, which already doubles as a user-generated city guide. Foursquare users can submit their own suggestions for activities and dishes to order at a particular restaurant, which will pop up when their friends “check in” on Foursquare from that venue.
But the Zagat partnership will add a slightly different layer to the content by incorporating recommendations culled from the company’s repository of reader reviews. For example, users who check into a Zagat-ranked restaurant will receive suggestions about great dishes or the best dessert on the menu.
Zagat also plans to run a series of “Meet the Mayor” interviews on its Web site, featuring Foursquare users who have checked in enough times at a particular location to earn the “mayor” title.
“There’s an added incentive for users to be the mayor of a Zagat-rated restaurant,” Mr. Charles said. “Also, visitors to our site who may not already know about Foursquare will learn about it. It’s a great cross-promotion.”
Foursquare has also been forging partnerships with city transit agencies, universities and media companies, like the Canadian daily Metro News. On Friday it will add The New York Times to the list.
In conjunction with the Winter Olympics, The Times will be offering recommendations to Foursquare users on restaurants, attractions, shopping and nightlife in Vancouver, Whistler and the nearby town of Squamish. The tips will be pulled from The Times’s travel and entertainment coverage.
Foursquare users who check in at one of the suggested venues will earn a New York Times Olympics badge, said Stacy Green, public relations manager for The New York Times Company.