It may be time to switch back to BUNNY EARS for your TV.

Just this morning I was speaking with a few friends about content delivery and if any of them have “cut the cable” (so to speak) from their TV provider.  None had, but I am interested in doing so. I do know a few colleagues that have cut the cable, and are using internet with AppleTV or other third party devices to view HD quality content on a big screen. And now, with all the DIGITAL signals, I’m actually thinking about getting some nice “bunny ears” for my hd/digital TV and getting great content for basically FREE! Some have done this, more are doing it… and here is an article from NPR about some who have.

After Digital Switch, Basic TV Offers Cable Alternative

EnlargeCatherine Welch for NPR

Mac, left, Veronica and Petra Humphrey watch the PBS children’s channel on their parents’ high definition television.

text sizeAAA

February 27, 2010

Just before summer 2009’s switch from analog to digital cable, TV viewers were inundated with commercials from cable companies. They urged viewers to subscribe to cable in order to get a clear picture and plenty of channels.

But it turns out that — for the price of an antenna — over-the-air television offers plenty of different programs.

The Secret In The Attic

Thanks to the digital signals, Elizabeth and Philip Humphrey’s three children can watch Elmo, Arthur and other favorites on one of three digital channels broadcast by North Carolina’s PBS station.

Trapped inside on a cold, gray morning, the Humphreys’ three children stand perfectly still in front of the TV, all eyes glued on Elmo.

The family also gets the additional digital channels offered by their commercial network affiliates too — which gives them about 12 channels to choose from, depending on where they point their antenna.

Phillip Humphrey climbs up into the attic, pushing past boxes of Christmas junk to where he mounted his new antenna.

“Basically it looks like a 2 1/2-by-2 1/2 square piece of welded wire fabric,” Humphrey says.

The antenna is attached to the rafters and connected to the Humphreys’ brand new high-definition television set downstairs. For the one-time cost of the set and the $75 antenna, the Humphreys have found an alternative to monthly cable bills. Viewers with old-fashioned TVs can also receive the same plethora of channels, as long as they have a digital converter box.

After Transition, Many Stick To Basic Stations

There are times that you may miss out on some cultural conversations about a particular show. But we’ve found if it’s something that continues to pique our interest, that now you can watch it on the Internet, you can rent it on Netflix.

– Elizabeth Humphrey, on not having cable

“And what happened on the way to the [TV] graveyard is people started realizing they’re extremely surprised at the picture quality you can get over the air,” says Richard Schneider, who owns Antennas Direct in St. Louis. “And in many cases the resolution is in fact significantly higher than you can get off of satellite or cable.”

Digital television also boosted the number of over-the-air choices.

“I think the broadcast-only environment is much richer than it was two years ago,” says Pat McDonough, senior vice president of planning policy and analysis at Nielsen Media Research.

Some critics say local affiliates are squandering the extra channels they got as they began to adapt to HDTV.

But McDonough says the ways they’re repeating shows is, in some cases, kind of creative.

“We are seeing some of them time-shifting their programming,” she says, “So that I air my news at 6 o’clock and I can put it on again at 8 o’clock on my second digital channel while I’m airing my network prime programs.”

McDonough says that without cable or satellite, the average national viewer can pick up around 30 channels. In Los Angeles, they can get a whopping 70 channels. McDonough says the number of homes getting only over-the-air television didn’t change much between 2008 and 2009. It’s roughly 11 million households. And she says it’s not just viewers who can’t afford cable.

“Five percent of the broadcast-only homes have income of over $100,000,” McDonough says. “So clearly they have the means to afford cable and satellite but they’ve elected not to purchase it.”

‘You Can Watch It On The Internet’

The Humphreys, for example, use their computers and television to catch their favorite shows. Elizabeth Humphrey admits that while they might miss some of the hot new cable shows, they’re getting most of what they want.

“There are times that you may miss out on some cultural conversations about a particular show,” she says. “But we’ve found if it’s something that continues to pique our interest, that now you can watch it on the Internet, you can rent it on Netflix. You can find other ways to get into the conversation.”

This sounds like it could be a problem for cable providers.

“We don’t really view it as a threat,” says Maureen Huff, senior director of public relations for Time Warner Cable.

Huff says subscription numbers for cable television, Internet and phone services have stayed strong in the face of more over-the-air channels and the crummy economy.

“Traditionally cable tends to be sort of recession-resistant,” Huff says. “People spend more time at home with their families in a recession; they’re spending less money going out. And so cable companies such as ours tend to do okay.”

Huff acknowledges that families who’ve made the choice to go without cable, such as the Humphreys, are out there. But young Veronica and Mac have seen what they’re missing at their friends’ houses.

“I wish I had SpongeBob,” Mac says.

Even their father has some cable cravings.

“Well, okay, The Daily Show would be nice to see,” he says.

But that, too, is available online.

Posted via email from John Ayers Posterous

It may be time to switch back to BUNNY EARS for your TV.

Just this morning I was speaking with a few friends about content delivery and if any of them have “cut the cable” (so to speak) from their TV provider.  None had, but I am interested in doing so. I do know a few colleagues that have cut the cable, and are using internet with AppleTV or other third party devices to view HD quality content on a big screen. And now, with all the DIGITAL signals, I’m actually thinking about getting some nice “bunny ears” for my hd/digital TV and getting great content for basically FREE! Some have done this, more are doing it… and here is an article from NPR about some who have.

After Digital Switch, Basic TV Offers Cable Alternative

Kids
EnlargeCatherine Welch for NPR

Mac, left, Veronica and Petra Humphrey watch the PBS children’s channel on their parents’ high definition television.

text sizeAAA

February 27, 2010

Just before summer 2009’s switch from analog to digital cable, TV viewers were inundated with commercials from cable companies. They urged viewers to subscribe to cable in order to get a clear picture and plenty of channels.

But it turns out that ? for the price of an antenna ? over-the-air television offers plenty of different programs.

The Secret In The Attic

Thanks to the digital signals, Elizabeth and Philip Humphrey’s three children can watch Elmo, Arthur and other favorites on one of three digital channels broadcast by North Carolina’s PBS station.

Trapped inside on a cold, gray morning, the Humphreys’ three children stand perfectly still in front of the TV, all eyes glued on Elmo.

The family also gets the additional digital channels offered by their commercial network affiliates too ? which gives them about 12 channels to choose from, depending on where they point their antenna.

Phillip Humphrey climbs up into the attic, pushing past boxes of Christmas junk to where he mounted his new antenna.

“Basically it looks like a 2 1/2-by-2 1/2 square piece of welded wire fabric,” Humphrey says.

The antenna is attached to the rafters and connected to the Humphreys’ brand new high-definition television set downstairs. For the one-time cost of the set and the $75 antenna, the Humphreys have found an alternative to monthly cable bills. Viewers with old-fashioned TVs can also receive the same plethora of channels, as long as they have a digital converter box.

After Transition, Many Stick To Basic Stations

There are times that you may miss out on some cultural conversations about a particular show. But we’ve found if it’s something that continues to pique our interest, that now you can watch it on the Internet, you can rent it on Netflix.

– Elizabeth Humphrey, on not having cable

“And what happened on the way to the [TV] graveyard is people started realizing they’re extremely surprised at the picture quality you can get over the air,” says Richard Schneider, who owns Antennas Direct in St. Louis. “And in many cases the resolution is in fact significantly higher than you can get off of satellite or cable.”

Digital television also boosted the number of over-the-air choices.

“I think the broadcast-only environment is much richer than it was two years ago,” says Pat McDonough, senior vice president of planning policy and analysis at Nielsen Media Research.

Some critics say local affiliates are squandering the extra channels they got as they began to adapt to HDTV.

But McDonough says the ways they’re repeating shows is, in some cases, kind of creative.

“We are seeing some of them time-shifting their programming,” she says, “So that I air my news at 6 o’clock and I can put it on again at 8 o’clock on my second digital channel while I’m airing my network prime programs.”

McDonough says that without cable or satellite, the average national viewer can pick up around 30 channels. In Los Angeles, they can get a whopping 70 channels. McDonough says the number of homes getting only over-the-air television didn’t change much between 2008 and 2009. It’s roughly 11 million households. And she says it’s not just viewers who can’t afford cable.

“Five percent of the broadcast-only homes have income of over $100,000,” McDonough says. “So clearly they have the means to afford cable and satellite but they’ve elected not to purchase it.”

‘You Can Watch It On The Internet’

The Humphreys, for example, use their computers and television to catch their favorite shows. Elizabeth Humphrey admits that while they might miss some of the hot new cable shows, they’re getting most of what they want.

“There are times that you may miss out on some cultural conversations about a particular show,” she says. “But we’ve found if it’s something that continues to pique our interest, that now you can watch it on the Internet, you can rent it on Netflix. You can find other ways to get into the conversation.”

This sounds like it could be a problem for cable providers.

“We don’t really view it as a threat,” says Maureen Huff, senior director of public relations for Time Warner Cable.

Huff says subscription numbers for cable television, Internet and phone services have stayed strong in the face of more over-the-air channels and the crummy economy.

“Traditionally cable tends to be sort of recession-resistant,” Huff says. “People spend more time at home with their families in a recession; they’re spending less money going out. And so cable companies such as ours tend to do okay.”

Huff acknowledges that families who’ve made the choice to go without cable, such as the Humphreys, are out there. But young Veronica and Mac have seen what they’re missing at their friends’ houses.

“I wish I had SpongeBob,” Mac says.

Even their father has some cable cravings.

“Well, okay, The Daily Show would be nice to see,” he says.

But that, too, is available online.

WOW! Olympics’ TV viewership larger than American Idol. There is hope for humanity!

OK, I actually watch American Idol… but am an avid fan of the Olympics. SO – I was please to read this article. 

To me, seeing an athlete compete on the world stage is more inspiring than the TV producing that surrounds horrible singers and drama on Idol. I should tell you that I also appreciate the great singing talent as the competition gets serious on Idol. Sure, there is drama threaded into the Olympics too… I recognize that. Bottom line: I have hope for humanity, seeing that the Olympic ratings are solid.
Thanks to Media Life for the article. 

Zowie! Olympics
beat ‘American Idol’

Games average 30 million viewers to 18.4 million

Feb 18, 2010

After six years, “American Idol’s” amazing winning streak is over.

NBC’s Winter Olympics finished ahead of the Fox smash during their shared hour last night, becoming the first program since “Fear Factor” in May 2004 to do so among either total viewers or adults 18-49. 

The Olympics averaged 30 million viewers and a 9.0 adults 18-49 rating at 9 p.m. against “Idol,” according to Nielsen overnights, well ahead of “Idol’s” still-formidable 18.4 million and 6.9 rating, both season lows.

It looks as though it will be the highest-rated night thus far of the Olympics, with early numbers tracking about 50 percent ahead of Turin four years ago.

But it took a heck of a U.S. effort to lift NBC past “Idol.” Three U.S. athletes — Shani Davis, Shaun White and Lindsey Vonn — won gold medals, increasing the U.S.’s total for these games to five. Davis’ victory was shown live, while word of Vonn’s win had already been widely circulated on the internet during the day.

Still, she and White are arguably the biggest stars on the U.S. team, with White being called one of the most dominant Olympians ever after last night’s halfpipe win. And snowboarding is very popular among young adults, the ones who also watch “Idol.”

“Idol” had defeated the Olympics by a few million viewers and a sizeable 18-49 margin on the previous night, and presumably will start a new unbeaten streak once the Winter Games are through. 

Meanwhile, NBC finished first for the night among 18-49s with an 8.9 average overnight rating and a 23 share. Fox was second at 4.5/12, CBS third at 1.8/5, Univision fourth at 1.7/4, ABC fifth at 1.5/4 and CW sixth at 0.4/1.

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback. Seven-day DVR data won’t be available for several weeks. Thirty-four percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

Also, ratings for NBC’s Olympics are approximate as fast nationals measure timeslot and not actual program data.

NBC was first during each hour of the night, beginning with a 7.6 at 8 p.m. for the Olympics, followed by Fox with a 2.1 for “Human Target.” ABC was third with a 1.7 for repeats of “Modern Family” and “The Middle,” Univision fourth with a 1.5 for “Hasta que el Dinero Nos Separe,” CBS fifth with a 1.3 for repeats of “The New Adventures of Old Christine” and “Gary Unmarried” and CW sixth with a 0.6 for a “Life Unexpected” rerun.

At 9 p.m. NBC led with a 9.0 for more Olympics, followed again by Fox with a 6.9 for “Idol.” Univision was third with a 2.4 for “Sortilegio,” CBS fourth with a 1.9 for a repeat of “Criminal Minds,” ABC fifth with a 1.5 for more “Modern Family” and “The Middle” reruns, and CW sixth with a 0.3 for a repeat of “Gossip Girl.”

NBC was first again at 10 p.m. with a 10.1 for the Olympics, with CBS second with a 2.0 for a repeat of “CSI: NY.” ABC was third with a 1.2 for repeats of “Cougar Town” and Univision fourth with a 1.1 for “Don Francisco Presenta.”

Among households, NBC led the night with a 16.7 average overnight rating and a 26 share. Fox was second at 7.4/11, CBS third at 4.5/7, ABC fourth at 2.6/4, Univision fifth at 2.1/3 and CW sixth at 0.7/1.
  

Toni Fitzgerald is a staff writer for Media Life.

Posted via email from John Ayers Posterous

WOW! Olympics’ TV viewership larger than American Idol. There is hope for humanity!

OK, I actually watch American Idol… but am an avid fan of the Olympics. SO – I was please to read this article. 

To me, seeing an athlete compete on the world stage is more inspiring than the TV producing that surrounds horrible singers and drama on Idol. I should tell you that I also appreciate the great singing talent as the competition gets serious on Idol. Sure, there is drama threaded into the Olympics too… I recognize that. Bottom line: I have hope for humanity, seeing that the Olympic ratings are solid.
Thanks to Media Life for the article. 

Zowie! Olympics
beat ‘American Idol’

Games average 30 million viewers to 18.4 million

Feb 18, 2010

After six years, “American Idol’s” amazing winning streak is over.

NBC’s Winter Olympics finished ahead of the Fox smash during their shared hour last night, becoming the first program since “Fear Factor” in May 2004 to do so among either total viewers or adults 18-49. 

The Olympics averaged 30 million viewers and a 9.0 adults 18-49 rating at 9 p.m. against “Idol,” according to Nielsen overnights, well ahead of “Idol’s” still-formidable 18.4 million and 6.9 rating, both season lows.

It looks as though it will be the highest-rated night thus far of the Olympics, with early numbers tracking about 50 percent ahead of Turin four years ago.

But it took a heck of a U.S. effort to lift NBC past “Idol.” Three U.S. athletes — Shani Davis, Shaun White and Lindsey Vonn — won gold medals, increasing the U.S.’s total for these games to five. Davis’ victory was shown live, while word of Vonn’s win had already been widely circulated on the internet during the day.

Still, she and White are arguably the biggest stars on the U.S. team, with White being called one of the most dominant Olympians ever after last night’s halfpipe win. And snowboarding is very popular among young adults, the ones who also watch “Idol.”

“Idol” had defeated the Olympics by a few million viewers and a sizeable 18-49 margin on the previous night, and presumably will start a new unbeaten streak once the Winter Games are through. 

Meanwhile, NBC finished first for the night among 18-49s with an 8.9 average overnight rating and a 23 share. Fox was second at 4.5/12, CBS third at 1.8/5, Univision fourth at 1.7/4, ABC fifth at 1.5/4 and CW sixth at 0.4/1.

As a reminder, all ratings are based on live-plus-same-day DVR playback. Seven-day DVR data won?t be available for several weeks. Thirty-four percent of Nielsen households have DVRs.

Also, ratings for NBC?s Olympics are approximate as fast nationals measure timeslot and not actual program data.

NBC was first during each hour of the night, beginning with a 7.6 at 8 p.m. for the Olympics, followed by Fox with a 2.1 for ?Human Target.? ABC was third with a 1.7 for repeats of ?Modern Family? and ?The Middle,? Univision fourth with a 1.5 for ?Hasta que el Dinero Nos Separe,? CBS fifth with a 1.3 for repeats of ?The New Adventures of Old Christine? and ?Gary Unmarried? and CW sixth with a 0.6 for a ?Life Unexpected? rerun.

At 9 p.m. NBC led with a 9.0 for more Olympics, followed again by Fox with a 6.9 for ?Idol.? Univision was third with a 2.4 for ?Sortilegio,? CBS fourth with a 1.9 for a repeat of ?Criminal Minds,? ABC fifth with a 1.5 for more ?Modern Family? and ?The Middle? reruns, and CW sixth with a 0.3 for a repeat of ?Gossip Girl.?

NBC was first again at 10 p.m. with a 10.1 for the Olympics, with CBS second with a 2.0 for a repeat of ?CSI: NY.? ABC was third with a 1.2 for repeats of ?Cougar Town? and Univision fourth with a 1.1 for ?Don Francisco Presenta.?

Among households, NBC led the night with a 16.7 average overnight rating and a 26 share. Fox was second at 7.4/11, CBS third at 4.5/7, ABC fourth at 2.6/4, Univision fifth at 2.1/3 and CW sixth at 0.7/1.
  

Toni Fitzgerald is a staff writer for Media Life.